Verify before consequence
Trust checks belong before a sensitive action, not only in an audit after the damage is done.
Agent Trust Gate™ is an independent UK technology project focused on a narrow but increasingly important question: how can an organisation verify authority for one consequential AI-agent action before it happens?
ATG does not try to become an entire AI governance platform. It concentrates on the pre-action boundary where a system must decide whether this requester, under this authority, may perform this exact consequential action now.
That focus has shaped the public demonstrator around Agent Standing, Verified Human Authority, exact-action GatePass, refusal behaviour and separate decision/execution evidence.
Make digital trust verifiable before action, observable during execution and accountable afterwards.
Control before action. Evidence during execution. Accountability after the event.
The public project deliberately favours clear boundaries and inspectable evidence over inflated capability claims.
Trust checks belong before a sensitive action, not only in an audit after the damage is done.
Unverifiable standing, stale proof, changed action or missing authority should not silently degrade into permission.
Where policy requires human authority, the human must be identifiable, current and authorised for the exact action.
Technical reviewers should be able to reproduce core demo behaviour and see refusal paths in public.
An allowed action is not automatically an executed action. Different receipts should record different facts.
Local demonstrator, production system, certification and commercial deployment are different stages and must not be conflated.
Agent Trust Gate is led from the United Kingdom by Gareth Price as Founder and Project Lead.
The project is intentionally public at the demonstrator level so serious reviewers can inspect the architecture, reproduce technical paths and challenge the claims. Commercial production integration, if pursued, would be separately scoped and secured.
ATG’s roadmap considers stronger agent identity, machine-to-machine trust, crypto agility, post-quantum readiness and low-latency risk-tiered gating — while keeping today’s public implementation claims firmly tied to what reviewers can inspect now.
Technical receipts should ultimately be understandable to customers, operators and accountable decision-makers.
Proof formats should be able to evolve as algorithms, credentials and evidence standards change.
Low-risk actions may eventually need safe fast paths, while higher-risk actions remain gated or refused.
We welcome technical criticism, reviewer feedback and design-partner conversations that respect the public project’s safety boundaries.