R
Technical review
Challenge the architecture, reproduce demo behaviour, identify unclear assumptions or discuss exact-action trust controls.
Corporate contact
Start with the trust problem.
For technical review, integration feasibility, institutional discussion or a controlled non-production evaluation, contact Agent Trust Gate directly. A short description is enough to begin.
Primary contact
Email Agent Trust Gate.
You can contact Gareth using either email address below. If you experience a delivery problem with the corporate address, please use Gmail.
Corporate email · primary
Founder & Project Lead · Gareth Price
gareth@agenttrustgate.comBackup email · Gmail
gpmiddleton71@gmail.comPlease do not send sensitive material in the first email.Do not send production credentials, secrets, customer data, regulated personal information, banking details, payment credentials, private datasets, production logs or confidential source code. A fictional, synthetic or properly sanitised scenario is enough for an initial discussion.
Useful first-message information
- Your organisation and role
- The consequential action or workflow being considered
- Why current authority controls may be insufficient
- Whether human approval is required
- The type of technical review you want
Enquiry routes
What we can discuss.
These email routes are for human-reviewed conversations. They are not automated agent endpoints, live support SLAs, payment channels or production integration interfaces.
I
Integration feasibility
Map one bounded exact-action workflow and examine where standing, authority, human approval and GatePass might fit.
P
Paid Evaluation Pilot
Paid evaluation pilots starting from £1,500. Pricing is indicative and scope-dependent. The pilot is bounded, local-first, evidence-led and synthetic or non-production unless separately agreed and safely designed; the buyer retains any real execution boundary.
Before contacting us
See what is already public.
The fastest serious conversation starts with the public evidence. Reviewers can inspect the architecture, demos, schemas and claims boundary before sending an enquiry.
A good first question
“Before this AI-enabled system performs this specific high-impact action, how do we prove that the exact requester has current authority, within the right scope, under the right human or organisational delegation?”
If that question matters to your workflow, ATG is relevant to the conversation.
Public technical repository
View repository →Gareth1953/agent-trust-gate
The public repository contains the reviewer kit, schemas, demonstrations, project history and commercial boundaries.