Application routes

Trust controls for actions that matter.

Agent Trust Gate is sector-agnostic at its core: prove standing, authority and exact-action evidence before consequence. Different sectors supply different policies, risk limits and approval rules around that boundary.

One architecture, multiple sectors

The same question appears everywhere.

Is this exact agent authorised to perform this exact consequential action now? ATG is designed around that question. The surrounding business and regulatory context changes; the need to prove authority before action does not.

Financial services

Payments, transfers and customer-impacting actions

Potential evaluation route for high-impact financial actions where scope, amount, account, evidence, separation of duties and verified human authority may be required before execution.

Payment or transfer authority
Customer remediation and refunds
Fraud/AML action escalation
Compliance or regulated workflow decisions
Market/trading actions requiring strict scope

Positioning boundaryATG would complement existing governance, authentication, model risk, transaction monitoring and regulatory controls — not replace them.

Financial-services route

Public procurement

Delegated authority before public buying

Potential pre-action control pattern for procurement workflows in which AI-assisted systems may propose or initiate consequential actions under formal delegated authority.

Purchase orders
Contract variations
Supplier and amount checks
Goods receipt and invoice approval
Payment release

Positioning boundaryATG is not a procurement platform and does not replace procurement rules, tender controls, delegated authority frameworks or existing eProcurement systems.

Public-procurement route

Retail & supply chain

Operational agents before physical or financial consequence

Potential trust boundary for autonomous or semi-autonomous retail and supply-chain workflows where agents move from recommendation into execution.

Replenishment and stock movement
Supplier substitution
Shipment rerouting
Inventory or fulfilment actions
Returns, refunds and credit notes

Positioning boundaryATG demonstrates authority controls around action; it is not a warehouse, ERP, logistics or supply-chain planning platform.

Retail & supply-chain route

Embedded commerce

Verify the final AI-generated basket before checkout

A local synthetic demonstrator can compare a proposed basket with buyer mandate, product restrictions, variants, substitution rules, quantity, price, fees, merchant, destination and current approval.

Basket integrity after approval
Item and total spending limits
Substitution and variant controls
Merchant and destination checks
Replay and evidence controls

Positioning boundaryNo live checkout, payment, retailer API or settlement integration is provided by the public demonstrator.

Embedded Commerce GatePass

Enterprise agentic AI

When an agent moves from advice to action.

Many agent systems are useful while they read, plan and recommend. The trust problem becomes sharper when an agent can write, approve, submit, publish, change access, move value or invoke a sensitive tool.

Sensitive tool calls

Introduce a proof boundary before tools whose use can cause material financial, operational, customer or security impact.

Delegated workflows

Bind agent authority to the principal, scope, counterparty, amount, purpose and evidence relevant to the current action.

Human escalation

Require current verified human authority for risk tiers or actions where automated authority alone is not sufficient.

See how the gate works Inspect evidence

Design-partner approach

We prove the trust architecture. The partner defines the real integration.

The public repository is intentionally safe and synthetic. A serious design-partner discussion would start by mapping a bounded real-world scenario without asking for production credentials, customer data or immediate system access.

Identify one high-consequence action
Define mandate, policy and authority inputs
Map the exact evidence required before action
Test allowed and refused scenarios locally
Produce findings and next-step recommendations

Paid Evaluation Pilot

Controlled, non-production evaluation

Indicative pricing currently starts from £1,500 for a defined local evaluation pilot, subject to written scope. Larger or customised evaluations are quoted separately.

No automatic acceptance, production access, payment execution, settlement authority or deployment commitment is implied by an enquiry or payment discussion.

Discuss an evaluation Read pilot boundary

Have a consequential agent action?

Bring us the control problem — not your secrets.

A short synthetic or sanitised scenario is enough to begin a serious technical conversation.

Start a discussion →